This presentation is an attempt to revive Chomsky’s LSLT (1955/1975) complex predicate approach to ECM under the neo-constructivist model of syntax (cf. Borer 2005). In particular, I argue that the ECM verb and the infinitive form a complex predicate in the LF component as a side-effect of the independently motivated head movement, and show that the proposed analysis can provide evidence against postulating an overt (either EPP- or Case-driven) Object Shift in ECM configurations.
For inquiries regarding the contents of this dataset, please contact the Corresponding Author listed in the README.txt file. Administrative inquiries (e.g., removal requests, trouble downloading, etc.) can be directed to data-management@arizona.edu